-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19117/#review37029
-----------------------------------------------------------


Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [19117]

All tests passed.

- Mesos ReviewBot


On March 13, 2014, 3:34 a.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19117/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 13, 2014, 3:34 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-855
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-855
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Introduced a new environment variable, MESOS_NATIVE_JAVA_LIBRARY. That 
> variable still points towards libmesos. For allowing a smooth transition 
> away from MESOS_NATIVE_LIBRARY towards MESOS_NATIVE_JAVA_LIBRARY whithin 
> JVM based frameworks.
> 
> Future versions of MESOS_NATIVE_LIBRARY will not point to valid JNI 
> bindings.
> 
> A typical java-based framework relies on mesos.jar to do the loading 
> but may use some extra logic in its startup to make sure 
> MESOS_NATIVE[_JAVA]_LIBRARY is set/valid. That extra-logic should now 
> be adapted by the framework developers to use the new environment 
> variable instead of the old one.
> MESOS_NATIVE_LIBRARY is now marked as being deprecated for use for JVM 
> based frameworks.
> 
> Note:
> MESOS_NATIVE_LIRBRAY will not be removed. It is kept for frameworks 
> that are not JVM based but need to bind to the self-contained Mesos 
> library.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   bin/mesos-slave-flags.sh.in dc73aef 
>   src/java/generated/org/apache/mesos/MesosNativeLibrary.java.in 231d1e2 
>   src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.cpp d0a1023 
>   src/tests/environment.cpp 5c92fcd 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19117/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>

Reply via email to