-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/#review38826
-----------------------------------------------------------


Hey Jie, this looks really good.

The only thing I would like to see before shipping is a test of the following:
  -Ensure that no-one transitions out of STARTING until all replicas are out of 
EMPTY.

You could probably fit this into your existing test by delaying the creation of 
the 3rd replica?


src/log/log.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/#comment71155>

    Can you update the documentation?
    
    I'm a bit hesitant about having an implicit 'auto-initialize=false', since 
it's less usable (from a developer/operator perspective). Maybe we should 
default to 'true' or require it to be specified?
    
    Up to you if you want to preserve the old API.



src/log/recover.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/#comment71158>

    Great comments! s/then/them/



src/log/recover.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/#comment71159>

    Just for sanity: (2 * quorum) - 1



src/log/recover.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/#comment71160>

    Would you mind re-ordering to add EMPTY + STARTING just so that it matches 
your comments above? Ditto below for STARTING + VOTING.



src/log/recover.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/#comment71161>

    Maybe we should make the transition to VOTING more explicit in the comment 
here?
    
    "If auto-initialization is enabled, all replicas will first go into 
STARTING status. Once *all* replicas have transitioned out of EMPTY status, the 
replicas will go into VOTING status."



src/log/recover.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/#comment71162>

    "re-running"?


- Ben Mahler


On March 17, 2014, 11:30 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 17, 2014, 11:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-984
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-984
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/log/log.hpp c2cb6cf 
>   src/log/log.cpp d9b2687 
>   src/log/recover.hpp 634bc06 
>   src/log/recover.cpp 688da5f 
>   src/tests/log_tests.cpp b368cde 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18600/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to