----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20157/#review39910 -----------------------------------------------------------
Hey Tim, my understanding was that we would have the default configuration build against the bundled 3rd party libraries only. For those interested in building packages, we would provide the optional ability to build against system libraries only. >From reading MESOS-1071, it doesn't look like there were any committers >chiming in on the conclusions reached. Please reach out to benh and vinod to >get their opinions, from a glance at this it looks to be removing boost from >our bundled libraries entirely. - Ben Mahler On April 9, 2014, 2:06 p.m., Timothy St. Clair wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/20157/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 9, 2014, 2:06 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1167 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1167 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Updates to use system installed version of boost with optional > --with-boost=<dir> override. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/Makefile.am eaa0db0 > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/boost-1.53.0.tar.gz b867ae9 > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/versions.am 9772753 > 3rdparty/libprocess/Makefile.am c785c4d > 3rdparty/libprocess/configure.ac 3c515ef > LICENSE 8757c20 > src/Makefile.am 95f133d > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20157/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Timothy St. Clair > >
