-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20850/#review41757
-----------------------------------------------------------


Looks great Alexandra, I made a few suggestions below, let me know what you 
think!


src/logging/logging.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20850/#comment75338>

    It doesn't look like the logging header needs to expose this?
    
    What if we remove this function and inside 'initialize()' we directly use 
LOG_AT_LEVEL to indicate that logging is initialized? Keeping the comment would 
be great though to let others understand that we're forcing the creation of the 
log file.



src/master/master.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20850/#comment75339>

    What about having getLogFile take a logging::Flags object? Since it already 
returns a Try we could even return Error() instead of EXIT(1) when the level is 
invalid.
    
    If we did this change, then logging::initialize could EXIT(1) when the 
level is invalid. It seems a bit unfortunate to have getLogSeverity call 
EXIT(1) when the input is invalid since it is exposed in the header and can be 
called from anywhere!
    
    E.g.:
    
    initialize(...)
    {
      ...
    
      if (flags.logging_level != "INFO" &&
          flags.logging_level != "WARNING" &&
          flags.logging_level != "ERROR") {
        EXIT(1) << ...;
      }
    
      // We can hide getLogSeverity from the header and we can do an internal 
CHECK inside, instead of EXIT(1).
      LogSeverity severity = getLogSeverity(flags.logging_level);
    
      LOG_AT_LEVEL(severity) << "Logging level " + flags.logging_level + " 
initialized";
    
      ...
    }


- Ben Mahler


On April 29, 2014, 4:06 p.m., Alexandra Sava wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20850/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 29, 2014, 4:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Rename 'minloglevel' flag in 'logging_level' in order to be consistent with 
> the existing flags.
> 
> Rename 'getMinLogLevel' function in 'getLogSeverity' to be more suggestive 
> for what it does.                                                          
> 
> Disallow configuring FATAL logging because it's a special case and it 
> involves too many changes across the entire source code.                      
>            
> 
> Create validation for the 'logging_level' flag in order to notify the user if 
> it had entered an unsupported value.                                         
> 
> Update the documentation for 'logging_level' flag, with the values it can 
> take.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/logging/flags.hpp 457feeeb7ca7ececf3c4e69189800ecb370053e6 
>   src/logging/logging.hpp 39c2934f733e5c058f62b5497f31f7a7057bb4c7 
>   src/logging/logging.cpp 176e49a6a2aef13be44ff910144c7321c942345a 
>   src/master/master.cpp f205dca43f10697862e3fd3f435f1127a9d0aecb 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp cb80609ba421b3b9a4664e600f0e53ecab8574c4 
>   src/webui/master/static/js/controllers.js 
> 4b8487e0c285f892ad352993c81637f38df1429f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20850/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexandra Sava
> 
>

Reply via email to