-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21329/#review42751
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/launcher/executor.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21329/#comment76627>

    Alphabetize please.



src/launcher/executor.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21329/#comment76629>

    Extra newline please.



src/tests/slave_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21329/#comment76637>

    You'll want to use 'test::flags.build_dir' instead of this object.


- Benjamin Hindman


On May 12, 2014, 8:59 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21329/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2014, 8:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Jason Dusek, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> It will be a common use case that external containerizer programs will have 
> to be able to control the command being carried out when the only the 
> task.command or container image is present.
> The command executor will in its current state try to run the command in the 
> context of the slave and not the container.
> 
> So, you could imagine the command executor being used by:
> 1) Replace the command to run when the slave sends a runTask message
> 2) Prefix a command to wrap call in when the slave sends a runTask message.
> 
> 1) have been implemented and tested in this patch, alongside making the 
> command-executor "cli-ized" with help messages.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp 312606b 
>   src/tests/containerizer.hpp 8e21bd1 
>   src/tests/containerizer.cpp 7dacab5 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp 458356d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21329/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check with new MesosExecutorWithOverride test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Niklas Nielsen
> 
>

Reply via email to