-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/#review44573
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/local/local.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/#comment78989>

    Do you need the temporary or can this just be:
    
    authorizer = authorizer_.get().release();



src/master/main.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/#comment78991>

    Add the option header include?



src/master/main.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/#comment78990>

    Ditto here.



src/master/master.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/#comment78994>

    Curious why you decided to add the 'owned' include even though there are no 
new Owned things in this change. At least we should include 'option' then too?



src/master/master.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/#comment78992>

    "Authorization is enabled"?



src/tests/cluster.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/#comment78993>

    Ditto here.


- Ben Mahler


On June 2, 2014, 6:01 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 2, 2014, 6:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Injected the Authorizer so that I can write more interesting tests.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/local/local.cpp 5d26afffcdca0eb9d19499564a8edd2bf3dc1e66 
>   src/master/main.cpp 8ceaae61a732a8d68d19c8aee97c1fd93a595893 
>   src/master/master.hpp d4ef4bec7168179f2168e88d3727e50b0e2e68a1 
>   src/master/master.cpp 766a0e36a6e7a615e7b2974d9fee70bcef446719 
>   src/tests/cluster.hpp f4cc9a62cd0ca86cd87987d963abd951a377ddd1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22150/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to