-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22162/#review44770
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/master/master.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22162/#comment79313>

    What is the longer term strategy for message validation? Having a single 
generically named 'validate' suggests a large number of overloads or other 
handlers? Isn't 'validate' a bit too generic for only validating framework 
registration and re-registration?
    
    Probably we should think carefully about how we want to do message 
validation in a more general sense in the master.


- Ben Mahler


On June 3, 2014, 3:30 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22162/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 3, 2014, 3:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Dominic Hamon, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1373
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1373
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a follow up for https://reviews.apache.org/r/21787.
> There exists duplication of logic in (re)-registerFramework methods.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp d4ef4bec7168179f2168e88d3727e50b0e2e68a1 
>   src/master/master.cpp 766a0e36a6e7a615e7b2974d9fee70bcef446719 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22162/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to