> On June 6, 2014, 5:18 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > src/linux/routing/filter/internal.hpp, line 306
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22310/diff/1/?file=604770#file604770line306>
> >
> >     Is it okay to drop this TODO?

Yes, we checked the source code in tc. The flowid is just a workaround for 
setting the 'terminal' flag.


> On June 6, 2014, 5:18 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> > src/linux/routing/filter/internal.hpp, line 223
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22310/diff/1/?file=604770#file604770line223>
> >
> >     So it's not considered an error to attempt to attach it to a non u32?

Good point. Returned error when attaching to a non u32.


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22310/#review44930
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 6, 2014, 5:13 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22310/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 6, 2014, 5:13 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Vinod Kone, and Cong Wang.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/routing/filter/action.hpp 8cc6594 
>   src/linux/routing/filter/internal.hpp cd3279a 
>   src/linux/routing/filter/ip.hpp 8f46ee5 
>   src/linux/routing/filter/ip.cpp 86dbf35 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22310/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> sudo make check
> 
> Also, tested with the un-submitted network isolator.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to