-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25075/#review51597
-----------------------------------------------------------


Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [25075]

Failed command: ./support/mesos-style.py

Error:
 Checking 505 files using filter 
--filter=-,+build/class,+build/deprecated,+build/endif_comment,+readability/todo,+readability/namespace,+runtime/vlog,+whitespace/blank_line,+whitespace/comma,+whitespace/ending_newline,+whitespace/forcolon,+whitespace/indent,+whitespace/line_length,+whitespace/tab,+whitespace/todo
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/path.hpp:82:  Missing space 
around colon in range-based for loop  [whitespace/forcolon] [2]
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/path.hpp:92:  Redundant blank 
line at the end of a code block should be deleted.  [whitespace/blank_line] [3]
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/path.hpp:122:  Namespace 
should be terminated with "// namespace path {"  [readability/namespace] [5]
Total errors found: 3

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Aug. 26, 2014, 9:12 p.m., Patrick Reilly wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25075/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 26, 2014, 9:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1733
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1733
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changed the stout path utility to declare a single, variadic 'join' function 
> instead of several separate declarations of various discrete arities
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/path.hpp bc6920a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25075/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran "make check" working on creating a new unit test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Patrick Reilly
> 
>

Reply via email to