Shouldn't we only expose meaningful metrics? Not sure whether users of the 
driver need consistent metrics vs master at the cost of having a meaningless 
one. Up to you.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Dominic Hamon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>> On Oct. 20, 2014, 6:07 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
>>> src/sched/sched.cpp, lines 1018-1021
>>> <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26951/diff/1/?file=726110#file726110line1018>
>>> 
>>>    What's the point of exposing this one, there are no calls to route()..?
> 
> For consistency with the Master event queue metrics.
> 
> 
> - Dominic
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26951/#review57507
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>> On Oct. 20, 2014, 12:07 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26951/
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> (Updated Oct. 20, 2014, 12:07 p.m.)
>> 
>> 
>> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
>> 
>> 
>> Bugs: MESOS-1943
>>    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1943
>> 
>> 
>> Repository: mesos-git
>> 
>> 
>> Description
>> -------
>> 
>> add dispatch and http request event counters to scheduler driver
>> 
>> 
>> Diffs
>> -----
>> 
>>  src/sched/sched.cpp a37ed3d2e11035650b9bf0440fb87f66669129d8 
>>  src/tests/scheduler_tests.cpp d6a7867452d19cf1e65b780d0801cb4a0cd98e18 
>> 
>> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26951/diff/
>> 
>> 
>> Testing
>> -------
>> 
>> make check
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Dominic Hamon
> 

Reply via email to