This is happening now. Please avoid making any more commits upstream while this is in progress.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Ian Downes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > We were waiting to get a number of fixes in on Friday; thanks for your > patience. They've been committed so I'm tagging the release candidate > today. I'll follow up shortly once the release candidate has been built. > > Thanks, > Ian > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Tom Arnfeld <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Has there been any further discussion on getting a release candidate for > > 0.21.0 cut? > > > > On 22 October 2014 22:12, Ian Downes <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Please note that we're targeting to cut this release next Wednesday, 29 > > > October. > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Can everyone who has ticket(s) that they absolutely want to get in > > 0.21.0 > > > > please mark them with "target version" as 0.21.0? That will make it > > easy > > > to > > > > track the blockers. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Adam Bordelon <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'd also like to see more of the modules work land in 0.21, > > especially > > > > the > > > > > Authenticator module (MESOS-1889). > > > > > I expect it to land in less than a week, but I don't know what your > > > > > timeframe is for 0.21. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Ian Downes > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone please volunteer to shepherd this work and comment on > > the > > > > > state > > > > > > of the review? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, R.B. Boyer < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone see if MESOS-1873 > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1873> is suitable > > for > > > > > > 0.21.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The patch is super simple <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26622/ > > > > > and > > > > > > fixes > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > showstopper bug in the command executor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Benjamin Hindman < > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Awesome, thanks Ben/Ian! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've got some Docker updates that we want to land in 0.21.0. > > My > > > > > > estimate > > > > > > > > is it will land sometime this week, or early next week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Benjamin Mahler < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We would like to cut 0.21.0 very soon to release the task > > > > > > > reconciliation > > > > > > > > > work that has been completed recently. I spoke with Ian > > Downes > > > > who > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > willing to be the release manager. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will let him reply here with a ticket and with other > > features > > > > > that > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > made it in the 0.21.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please reply to this thread if you have anything that you > > think > > > > > needs > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > land in 0.21.0! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
