-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/#review61002
-----------------------------------------------------------


Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [27493, 27494, 27806, 27493]

Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 27493

Error:
 2014-11-12 17:16:19 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/27493/diff/raw/ 
[16060/16060] -> "27493.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/Makefile.am:389
error: src/Makefile.am: patch does not apply
error: src/authentication/authenticatee.hpp: already exists in index
error: patch failed: src/authentication/cram_md5/authenticatee.hpp:19
error: src/authentication/cram_md5/authenticatee.hpp: patch does not apply
error: src/examples/test_authentication_modules.cpp: already exists in index
error: src/examples/test_authenticator_module.cpp: does not exist in index
error: src/module/authenticatee.hpp: already exists in index
error: patch failed: src/module/manager.cpp:57
error: src/module/manager.cpp: patch does not apply
Failed to apply patch

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Nov. 12, 2014, 5:06 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 5:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2042
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2042
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/sched/constants.hpp 63707a8 
>   src/sched/constants.cpp 44ccfbe 
>   src/sched/flags.hpp 62a634b 
>   src/sched/sched.cpp 8ca0526 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27812/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> Note that technically this patch does not depend on 27495 - just included it 
> in the dependencies to make the reviewbot happy.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>

Reply via email to