> On Nov. 11, 2014, 3:17 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote: > > Can you expand a little bit on why you needed a new async watcher? Maybe > > add it to the review request description :-) > > Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > The point of this new async watcher is to start to separate out the 3 > concepts that currently use the same event loop: > 1) timers > 2) polling (io::poll) > 3) network io
See - that would be nice to capture in the description :) - Niklas ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27502/#review60883 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 11, 2014, 8:53 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/27502/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 11, 2014, 8:53 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie Yu, Joris Van Remoortere, Niklas > Nielsen, and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp > 85fb9958342f0bcdde322d9c55333126e6f86668 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27502/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Benjamin Hindman > >
