-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30002/#review68556
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/30002/#comment112864>

    Please explain why you are testing this in a comment. It is not immediately 
evident why the return code from a running container and a stopped one should 
match here.



src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/30002/#comment112865>

    You don't seem to be using this variable.


- Bernd Mathiske


On Jan. 16, 2015, 5:43 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30002/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 16, 2015, 5:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Bernd Mathiske.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix docker tests and warnings running in verbose logging.
> 
> Some of the docker tests verifies that the container output is written to 
> stdout/stderr based on set command and image.
> As we moved the docker container execution to the executor, with verbose 
> logging turned out the log actually logs out the docker run command which 
> also will contain expected text from the output.
> 
> Therefore, the unit tests are instead matching expected text with an exact 
> line as it expects the output is echoed with a new line.
> 
> Also fixed warning about glog and making stop virtual so the expect_call 
> works.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/docker/docker.hpp 3ebbc1f82ac388c4d348417ae33ccc2a56ad3f28 
>   src/docker/executor.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> 2105ae2c410f01e7e0d10241d5c00df143fd3439 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30002/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check gtest_repeat=-1 and gtest_shuffle
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to