-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30036/#review71228
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



include/mesos/mesos.proto
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/30036/#comment116899>

    Can we add a small comment about semantics here? Specifically, if we've 
already cached and then run another command without 'cache' what will happen? 
Also, can we s/caching/cache/ to show the action?



src/slave/flags.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/30036/#comment116900>

    Lets explain why we aren't nesting this in the work directory, i.e., it's 
not an automatic flag: (1) it's probably not meant to be backed up (that's a 
lot of data to back up) and (2) you might want to put it on a different disk.


- Benjamin Hindman


On Jan. 25, 2015, 11:27 a.m., Bernd Mathiske wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30036/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 11:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Till Toenshoff, and 
> Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESO-2069
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESO-2069
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Extends the CommandInfo::URI protobuf with a boolean "caching" field that 
> will later cause fetcher cache actions. Also introduces the notion of a cache 
> directory to the fetcher info protobuf. And then propagates these additions 
> throughout the rest of the code base where applicable. This includes passing 
> the slave ID all the way down to the place where the cache dir name is 
> constructed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/fetcher/fetcher.proto 
> facb87b92bf3194516f636dcc348e136af537721 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 26003fada2e4c4be0e9ebc4663f7ebab858cc48d 
>   src/launcher/fetcher.cpp fed0105946da579a38357a30e7ae56e646e05b89 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.hpp b7bf54ac65d6c61622e485ac253513eaac2e4f88 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 5f4b4ce49a9523e4743e5c79da4050e6f9e29ed7 
>   src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.hpp 
> 1db0eaf002c8d0eaf4e0391858e61e0912b35829 
>   src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp 
> d290f95251def3952c5ee34f600e1d71467f6293 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 
> 802988c90ac872b0cefa5e28f06e6fec98e8d032 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> d712278428889ebdfd598537690138329d8464f0 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp a3c5c68a553b1c88ce6d5177e625079f7cdb2e5f 
>   src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> 2105ae2c410f01e7e0d10241d5c00df143fd3439 
>   src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp 8c0b0757eb388f1684d8b94393983f1844a769a7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30036/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bernd Mathiske
> 
>

Reply via email to