> On Feb. 23, 2015, 7 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> > src/tests/port_mapping_tests.cpp, line 82
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31308/diff/3/?file=872983#file872983line82>
> >
> >     Just looked at the pastebin file (Thanks!), can we either replace the 
> > entire `using mesos::internal::slave::*` code block with `using namespace 
> > mesos::internal::slave` or remove the new code block and add the missing 
> > members using `using mesos::internal::slave::XYZ`?
> 
> Dominic Hamon wrote:
>     we really should avoid using namespace. i know we don't but our style 
> guide says we do. so we should make some token effort on this.

Included: 

using mesos::internal::slave::Containerizer;
using mesos::internal::slave::EXECUTOR_REREGISTER_TIMEOUT;
using mesos::internal::slave::Fetcher;
using mesos::internal::slave::PortMappingStatistics;
using mesos::internal::slave::Slave;

using namespace mesos::internal::slave::paths;


- Evelina


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31308/#review73626
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 23, 2015, 7:16 p.m., Evelina Dumitrescu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31308/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 23, 2015, 7:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Dominic Hamon.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/port_mapping_tests.cpp 62cc9a786c2b54ff6078469a9f159dd300718cf5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31308/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Evelina Dumitrescu
> 
>

Reply via email to