-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32130/#review76750
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32130/#comment124405>

    just name the argument 'update_' to avoid making these many name changes in 
the method.



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32130/#comment124406>

    s/update/update_/



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32130/#comment124407>

    Pull this to the top.
    
    // Make a copy to set source.
    StatusUpdate update = update_;



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32130/#comment124408>

    pull this down to where it's first used, #2517.


- Vinod Kone


On March 16, 2015, 11:06 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32130/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 16, 2015, 11:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Niklas Nielsen and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2499
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2499
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A status update originating from executor should have the TaskStatus::source 
> field set to TaskStatus::SOURCE_EXECUTOR. Set this field in the slave to be 
> future proof (a future where there will be no executor driver). Previous code 
> has a bug and updated a copy of the update that was not forwarded. Add some 
> checks for source and reason for status updates in existing tests.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 0f99e4efb8fa2b96f120a3e49191158ca0364c06 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp a975305430097a8295b4b155e8448572c12bde22 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32130/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (Mac OS 10.9.5, CentOS 7.0.1406)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to