> On April 8, 2015, 5:52 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp, lines 1626-1628
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32845/diff/1/?file=915074#file915074line1626>
> >
> >     Shall we check `framework->pid == from` as we do in 
> > `Master::unregisterFramework()`?
> >     
> >     Also metrcis update
> >     `++metrics->messages_unregister_framework;` should be migrated to 
> > `removeFramework()`.
> 
> Vinod Kone wrote:
>     We do this check for all calls. It is above the switch statement in this 
> function.
>     
>     Metrics, I'll add later.

I see it now, sorry, my bad.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32845/#review79381
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 20, 2015, 8:04 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32845/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 20, 2015, 8:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1127
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1127
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Renamed UNREGISTER call to UNSUBSCRIBE for consistency.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto 
> 783a63ad1cc0edd86605d638046fb959cb6e97e8 
>   src/examples/low_level_scheduler_libprocess.cpp 
> 63d34eefb60d13fe2b82905c1cec9b762340e997 
>   src/examples/low_level_scheduler_pthread.cpp 
> 6d1f938660c02db75bfcbf7c8de0d941cff1920d 
>   src/master/master.cpp e30b951eda2b3b0d5b2a80716f0b32c6bbe041bc 
>   src/scheduler/scheduler.cpp 584b042e32865fdf875bf41ebcfb7f9c327d882a 
>   src/tests/scheduler_tests.cpp 4a89a7a88b50bb8c254f5076661ce07ac9fc7657 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32845/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to