inline... On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Benjamin Hindman <b...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> +1 This sounds great to me Marco. I love eliminating Reopened, as well as > simplifying (constraining) other transitions. I couple of quick questions: > > Why does stoping progress go from In Progress back to Open instead of > Accepted? Seems like it's still an Accepted issue just not being worked on. > I thought about it and it occurs to me that there are three reasons why one would "Stop Progress": 1. I haven't got time, and more important stuff came along (this is the case your question seems to imply) 2. I looked into it, and it really doesn't seem worth/desirable to do, ever (covered in "Resolved - won't fix") 3. I looked into it, and I have my doubts this may ever be desirable, but I'll leave it to others to decide (the current "Stop Progress) I've added a "Pause Progress" transition (back to "Accepted") that covers case #1 - would this work? > Can we resolve or close something directly from Open? For example, issues > we're never going to work on or are duplicates or already fixed, etc. > Sure - added. > > Do we need both Resolved and Closed? This has come up in the past, we tend > to close issues after we cut a release with them, but it's kind of an extra > step that I'm not convinced we really need to do. > Got rid of Closed. As both Bens don't like it - I think it was doomed :) > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM Marco Massenzio <ma...@mesosphere.io> > wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > Please take a look at MESOS-2806: in a nutshell, our current workflow is > > rather convoluted and brings about a host of issues, when managing tasks' > > status transitions (detailed in the Jira - see screenshots there). > > > > This is what it currently looks like: > > > > [image: Inline image 1] > > > > (spaghetti workflow? :) > > > > I would propose to simplify it to the following: > > > > [image: Inline image 2] > > > > I'm sure we can think up all sorts of corner cases, but I would submit > > that simplicity would trump complexity and allow us to track progress (or > > lack thereof) of stories/tasks/bugs in a much more punctual manner. > > > > Anyone against it? > > > > *Marco Massenzio* > > *Distributed Systems Engineer* > > >
