Hi,
For now, master would kill the slave when re-registering timeout
according to the document.
> If the slave takes longer than this timeout to re-register, the master
shuts down the slave, which in turn shuts down any live executors/tasks.
* 1. * I think it's more friendly and directly that the slave only kill the
executors without exiting, after that the slave start register.
On the other hand, It would take some effort to support this, maybe
it's not worth.
What's your opinion?
*2. *The slave has a flag recovery_timeout which is 15min by default.
Also the slave will fail to re-register and kill the executors when it
takes longer than the health check timeout ( which is 75s). So the
executors are useless after 75s.
* I'm wondering why the recovery_timeout is 15min by default. I think
that 75s is enough.* Is this a good idea?
Thanks for your time.
Best regards.
