Looks like I introduced it initially, sorry about that. Michael, is there a plan to replace 'foreach' with range-based for loops?
I've thought about this and I don't know exactly how we would want to do it as a community. I've filed MESOS-3214 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3214> with listing 2 possible approaches. Please share your thoughts and preferences there! Thanks, MPark. On 4 August 2015 at 20:19, Artem Harutyunyan <[email protected]> wrote: > We should also come up with the recommended way of dealing with > foreachpair and foreachvalue occurrences. I did a quick grep and there > seem to be over 900 places where foreach(value/pair) are used. It's > going to be quite a change (albeit a straightforward one), but we > should still be all for it :-). > > Cheers, > Artem. > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Benjamin Mahler > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I noticed there was a single ranged-based for loop introduced in the > source > > tree: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/tests/resources_tests.cpp#L1004 > > > > Since this is the only one in the codebase AFAICT, I've removed it to > keep > > our use of 'foreach' consistent. Michael, is there a plan to replace > > 'foreach' with range-based for loops? Would just like there to be a > > consistent way to loop over containers. :) >
