I definitely had to create a new gpg key because my previous one expired! I
uploaded them id.apache and our SVN repo containing KEYS.

Do I need to do anything specific for maven?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> wrote:

> Haven't seen that one. Are you sure you've got your gpg key properly set up
> with Maven?
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I'm getting the following error when running ./support/tag.sh. Has any of
> > the recent release managers seen this one before?
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.7:deploy (default-deploy)
> on
> > project mesos: Failed to deploy artifacts: Could not transfer artifact
> > org.apache.mesos:mesos:jar:0.24.0-rc1 from/to apache.releases.https (
> > https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2):
> > java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not generate DH keypair: Prime size
> must
> > be multiple of 64, and can only range from 512 to 1024 (inclusive) ->
> [Help
> > 1]
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Update:
> > >
> > > There are 3 outstanding tickets (all related to flaky tests), that we
> are
> > > trying to resolve. Any help fixing those (esp. MESOS-3050
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3050>) would be
> > appreciated!
> > >
> > > Planning to cut an RC as soon as they are fixed (assuming no new ones
> > crop
> > > up).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:50 AM, James DeFelice <
> > james.defel...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Awesome - thanks so much!
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Bernd Mathiske <be...@mesosphere.io>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I just committed it. Thanks, James!
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Aug 13, 2015, at 9:53 PM, James DeFelice <
> > james.defel...@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi Vinod,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Would *really* like to see
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2841
> > >> > > in 0.24.0. Currently in review.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Any chance that can make it in?
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Removed the target versions for all unresolved tickets (except
> for
> > >> HTTP
> > >> > >> scheduler API ones) targeted for 0.24.0
> > >> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2562>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Hoping to cut an RC tomorrow.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@gmail.com
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> Hi,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> The tracking ticket for the 0.24.0 release is
> > >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2562
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> The main feature of this release is going to be v1 (beta)
> release
> > of
> > >> > the
> > >> > >>> HTTP scheduler API.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Hoping to cut an RC early next week, so if there's anything you
> > >> > >> absolutely
> > >> > >>> need to be in 0.24.0 please land them by EOW.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Adam Bordelon <
> > a...@mesosphere.io>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> Thanks, Vinod.
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> I've got a handful of JIRAs I'd really like to see land in
> > 0.24.0.
> > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2559 Do not use
> > >> > >>>> RunTaskMessage.framework_id.
> > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2600 Add /reserve
> > and
> > >> > >>>> /unreserve endpoints on the master for dynamic reservation
> > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2998 Disable
> > >> Persistent
> > >> > >>>> Volumes, Dynamic Reservations via master flags
> > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3050 Failing ROOT_
> > >> tests
> > >> > in
> > >> > >>>> 0.23.0-rc3 on CentOS 7.1
> > >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3079 `sudo make
> > >> > distcheck`
> > >> > >>>> fails on Ubuntu 14.04 (and possibly other OSes too)
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> I understand your desire to untarget the majority of the
> tickets,
> > >> > since
> > >> > >>>> it's a time-based release, but we might want to keep some of
> > these
> > >> > >>>> targeted
> > >> > >>>> so we can track the priority issues. When the actual rc1 cut
> date
> > >> > >>>> approaches, it's pretty easy to aggressively push things out of
> > the
> > >> > >>>> release
> > >> > >>>> that haven't made it. Let me know what you think.
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >> > >>>> -A-
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Vinod Kone <
> > vinodk...@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>>> Hi folks,
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> I will be the release manager for the upcoming release (ETA
> > early
> > >> > >>>> August).
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> To prep for the release (and make my life easy) I'm planning
> to
> > >> > remove
> > >> > >>>> the
> > >> > >>>>> target versions for all *unresolved* tickets that have a
> target
> > >> > >> version
> > >> > >>>>> 0.24.0.
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> I would like folks to explicitly set the target version to
> > 0.24.0*
> > >> > for
> > >> > >>>>> tickets they want to absolutely land in the next release
> > (keeping
> > >> in
> > >> > >>>> mind
> > >> > >>>>> the time frame). If you are unsure, please reach out to me or
> > >> reply
> > >> > to
> > >> > >>>> this
> > >> > >>>>> thread.
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> The main blocking feature for this release is going to the new
> > >> HTTP
> > >> > >> API.
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >> > >>>>> Vinod
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> P.S. If things go according to plan we might make this 1.0
> > >> release!
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > James DeFelice
> > >> > > 585.241.9488 (voice)
> > >> > > 650.649.6071 (fax)
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> James DeFelice
> > >> 585.241.9488 (voice)
> > >> 650.649.6071 (fax)
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to