Sure, that's fine with me. Since the fix for the flaky test was a flaw
in the test itself there shouldn't be any issues.

Thanks for double checking. Especially since my vote was non-binding.

Kevin

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Michael Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> Sorry for missing your flaky test patch. It seems like we added the 0.27.2
> to the backports list after you had indicated that 0.24.2, 0.25.1, and
> 0.26.1
> needs to include the patch. We should have asked whether this needs to
> be included in 0.27.2 as well. I think we missed it because there were many
> patches that needed to be included in 0.24.2, 0.25.1 and 0.26.1 but not
> 0.27.2
> since they had made it into 0.27.0 or 0.27.1.
>
> Having said that, I'm inclined to agree with Joris and proceed since it
> doesn't
> have much of an impact in terms of the resulting binary, for example.
>
> Could you confirm or deny whether you're ok with this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> MPark
>
> On 4 March 2016 at 15:51, Joris Van Remoortere
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>> Greg's upgrade scripts & CI results
>>
>> The missing commit is for a flaky test which doesn't influence the
>> production binaries.
>> Unless we need to cut another RC for a bug, I suggest we move ahead.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jörg Schad <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Except the missing fix for Mesos-4518, if we consider cutting a rc2
>> > for that, maybe we could include the fix for MESOS-4677 as well (see
>> > failing ROOT_CGROUPS_Pids_and_Tids test below).
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > All the failing tests I encountered seem to be known.
>> >
>> > Centos 7
>> > * LimitedCpuIsolatorTest.ROOT_CGROUPS_Pids_and_Tids  (fixed with
>> > MESOS-4677 for 0.28 )
>> > * LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTest.ROOT_MultipleContainers (open ticket
>> > MESOS-4423)
>> >
>> > Centos 7 - SSL
>> > All green
>> >
>> > Centos 6 (+/- SSL)
>> > * MemoryPressureMesosTest.CGROUPS_ROOT_SlaveRecovery (reopened
>> > MESOS-4047)
>> >
>> > Debian 8 (+/- SSL)
>> > * DockerContainerizerTest.ROOT_DOCKER_Kill (seems the same issue as
>> > MESOS-3937)
>> >
>> > Ubuntu 15 (+/- SSL)
>> > Green
>> >
>> > Ubuntu 14 (+/- SSL)
>> > Green
>> >
>> > Ubuntu 12 (+/- SSL)
>> > Green
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Kevin Klues <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > -1 (non-binding)
>> > >
>> > > This release
>> > > candidate
>> > > should have included the backport to re
>> > > s
>> > > olv
>> > > e
>> > > MESOS-4518 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4518>.
>> > > All of the other release candidates that came out as backports
>> > > recently
>> > > have included this, but somehow this one was overlooked.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Greg Mann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I was able to successfully test a simple upgrade scenario between
>> > >> 0.26.1-rc1 and 0.27.2-rc1 using Niklas's upgrade testing script,
>> > >> which
>> > I've
>> > >> modified slightly and reposted here:
>> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44229/
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Kevin Klues <[email protected]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > The others all seem to have them though:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commits/0.26.1-rc1/src/tests/master_tests.cpp
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commits/0.25.1-rc1/src/tests/master_tests.cpp
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commits/0.24.2-rc1/src/tests/master_tests.cpp
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Just not:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commits/0.27.2-rc1/src/tests/master_tests.cpp
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Klues <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > > Looks like this rc is missing this commit:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/d3108d776b6f7121e37176eda686ecc7245be4cd
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Joris Van Remoortere
>> > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >> > >> @Michael Browning:
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> MasterTest.MaxCompletedTasksPerFrameworkFlag [flaky, tracked in
>> > >> > >>> MESOS-4518]
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> This is supposed to be fixed in this release. It is concerning
>> > >> > >> that
>> > >> this
>> > >> > >> came up.
>> > >> > >> Can you verify this and provide logs to Kevin Klues?
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> —
>> > >> > >> Joris Van Remoortere
>> > >> > >> Mesosphere
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Michael Browning <
>> > >> > [email protected]>
>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> Fedora 23: `make check` non-root OK
>> > >> > >>> OS X: `make check` non-root OK
>> > >> > >>> Ubuntu 14.04: `make check` non-root, three failures:
>> > >> > >>> ContainerLoggerTest.DefaultToSandbox [flaky, tracked in
>> > MESOS-4615]
>> > >> > >>> MasterQuotaTest.AvailableResourcesAfterRescinding [flaky,
>> > >> > >>> tracked
>> > in
>> > >> > >>> MESOS-4542]
>> > >> > >>> MasterTest.MaxCompletedTasksPerFrameworkFlag [flaky, tracked in
>> > >> > >>> MESOS-4518]
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Greg Mann
>> > >> > >>> <[email protected]>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> > `sudo make check` on Ubuntu 14.04 using gcc, with libevent
>> > >> > >>> > and
>> > SSL
>> > >> > >>> > enabled.
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> > All tests pass except
>> > >> > MemoryPressureMesosTest.CGROUPS_ROOT_Statistics,
>> > >> > >>> > which seems to be due to the issue found here:
>> > >> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4053
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Michael Park
>> > >> > >>> > <[email protected]
>> > >
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> > > Vinod, we've only committed the CHANGELOGs to the specific
>> > tags.
>> > >> I
>> > >> > >>> > > didn't
>> > >> > >>> > > realize that I should commit those to master as well, but
>> > >> > >>> > > it
>> > >> makes
>> > >> > >>> > > total
>> > >> > >>> > > sense to do so. I'll do that. Thanks.
>> > >> > >>> > >
>> > >> > >>> > > On 29 February 2016 at 13:50, Vinod Kone <
>> > [email protected]>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > >>> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> I don't see CHANGELOGs for these versions on the master
>> > branch?
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> > >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Neil Conway <
>> > >> > [email protected]>
>> > >> > >>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> > >> > As described (briefly) in the release emails, 0.27.2,
>> > 0.26.1,
>> > >> > >>> > >> > 0.25.1,
>> > >> > >>> > >> > and 0.24.2 contains a new feature: "reliable floating
>> > >> > >>> > >> > point
>> > >> for
>> > >> > >>> > >> > scalar
>> > >> > >>> > >> > resources" (MESOS-4687).
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > To elaborate on that slightly, Mesos now only supports
>> > scalar
>> > >> > >>> > >> > resource
>> > >> > >>> > >> > values with three decimal digits of precision (e.g.,
>> > reserving
>> > >> > >>> > >> > "5.001
>> > >> > >>> > >> > CPUs" for a task). As a result of this change,
>> > >> > >>> > >> > frameworks
>> > that
>> > >> > do
>> > >> > >>> > >> > their own resource math may see slightly different
>> > >> > >>> > >> > results;
>> > >> > >>> > >> > furthermore, if any frameworks were trying to manage
>> > extremely
>> > >> > >>> > >> > fine-grained resource values (> 3 decimal digits of
>> > >> precision),
>> > >> > >>> > >> > that
>> > >> > >>> > >> > will no longer be supported.
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > For more information, please see:
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mesos-user/201602.mbox/%3CCAOW5sYZJn5caBOwZyPV008JgL1F2FYFxL_bM5CtYA2PF2OG7Bw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/14qLxjZsfIpfynbx0USLJR0GELSq8hdZJUWw6kaY_DXc/edit?usp=sharing
>> > >> > >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4687
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > Neil
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Michael Park <
>> > >> > [email protected]>
>> > >> > >>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > Hi all,
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
>> > Apache
>> > >> > Mesos
>> > >> > >>> > >> 0.27.2.
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > 0.27.2 includes the following:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > MESOS-4693 - Variable shadowing in
>> > >> > >>> > >> HookManager::slavePreLaunchDockerHook.
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > MESOS-4711 - Race condition in libevent poll
>> > implementation
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > causes
>> > >> > >>> > >> crash.
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > MESOS-4754 - The "executors" field is exposed under a
>> > >> > backwards
>> > >> > >>> > >> > incompatible
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > schema.
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > MESOS-4687 - Implement reliable floating point for
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > scalar
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > resources.
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > The CHANGELOG for the release is available at:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mesos.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=0.27.2-rc1
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > The candidate for Mesos 0.27.2 release is available
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > at:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/0.27.2-rc1/mesos-0.27.2.tar.gz
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > The tag to be voted on is 0.27.2-rc1:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mesos.git;a=commit;h=0.27.2-rc1
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/0.27.2-rc1/mesos-0.27.2.tar.gz.md5
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > The signature of the tarball can be found at:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/0.27.2-rc1/mesos-0.27.2.tar.gz.asc
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > The PGP key used to sign the release is here:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/mesos/KEYS
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > The JAR is up in Maven in a staging repository here:
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemesos-1104
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Mesos
>> > >> 0.27.2!
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > The vote is open until Wed Mar 2 23:59:59 PST 2016 and
>> > >> passes
>> > >> > if
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > a
>> > >> > >>> > >> > majority
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Mesos 0.27.2
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > Thanks,
>> > >> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >> > > MPark, Joris, Kapil
>> > >> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> > >>> > >>
>> > >> > >>> > >
>> > >> > >>> > >
>> > >> > >>> >
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > --
>> > >> > > ~Kevin
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > ~Kevin
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > ~Kevin
>> >
>
>



-- 
~Kevin

Reply via email to