Bump. This should be a pretty small change, any takers?
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Shuai Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for the new `filename` field for the URI. It would also be useful for > implementing base64:// or data:// scheme uri fetcher, so that the scheduler > can pass arbitary file blobs to the task directly without resorting to a > custom executor. (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4524) > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Michael Browning <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Looking for a shepherd for this task: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4735 >> >> As Zhitao mentioned in the ticket, the frequently-encountered >> inability to extract archives from webhdfs-fetched files due to the >> inclusion of things like query params in the resulting filename is >> kind of a blocker for us, and there seems to be interest from others >> too, q.v.: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4779 >> >> My proposed fix is basically that proposed by Erik in the ticket: add >> an optional string `filename` field to the CommandInfo.URI protobuf -- >> when omitted, the old behavior will be retained, but when specified >> the file will be saved to the sandbox with that filename. Any feedback >> would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> Michael >>
