Cong, it's strange that you project your frustrations—which are understandable and may have good reasons—on the project as a whole. There are reasons why things are done in the way they are done; our primary goal is quality, we'd rather have a few well implemented features rather than a bunch of half-finished efforts that are hard to maintain. This means sometimes we can't distract and invest time into some great but not yet prioritized features.
You brought up some reasonable suggestions in other threads. As every group of people with more that 1 person, Mesos community has some inertia. Features, ideas, and processes should settle down and cook for a while (except if it is a critical bug). It would be great if we can work together improving developer experience, despite frustrations, inertia, and personal opinions. But everyone can easily help us to deal with the known issues. Reviewing patches of other contributors, paying attention to style and typos, do better testing. All these things can be done right now, without discussion and involving committers and will directly help them (committers) to feel more comfortable about the feature and land patches. For example, you could have reviewed r/47281/ and help José, right? It would also help if we separate technical discussions from operational issues. This way it's easier to search history. Though k8s is a great project, I don't think that hopping from project to project is a rewarding experience. Like in a relationship, sometimes one should invest time and effort to make things work. And be patient and forgiving : ). On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:22 PM, José Guilherme Vanz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > If is always difficult to find I shepherd, change the approach can be a > > good ideia. Maybe remove this burocracy of a shepherd and keep just the > > review board and reviews. Once a new patch is uploaded the > > commiters/reviewers should review and give their feedback. All the > history > > will be in the Jira and review board. > > Surely it is, people are just pretending to be blind... > > For a very quick example: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4738 > > I suggested the same, but as I expected nothing changes. I am quite > sure it will not change probably forever. > > Move to to work on something else, e.g. Kubernetes. ;) >
