Justin,

There's certainly a bug somewhere, either in mesos kafka framework or mesos
itself. If I can get this
mesos master running under debugger, this would be over in maybe few hours
or few days.

Kafka is a stateful service so can't run on marathon directly, there has to
be some framework/wrapper
which manages brokers - Read here
<https://mesosphere.com/blog/2015/07/16/making-apache-kafka-elastic-with-apache-mesos/>
.

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Justin Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:

> inline
>
> On 6/3/16, 2:19 PM, "Vinit Mahedia" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Justin,
> >Yeah - as long as everything is on a single box (mesos-kafka scheduler,
> mesos-master, zk etc.)
> >things work just fine, which is what I meant by local setup.
> >
> >
> >I did a local cluster setup as well, 3 vagrant machines, where it does
> >not work. So it does not work at all
> >if you have multi node setup (vagrant machines or bare metal).
> >
>
> I do have two working clusters, but the mesos-kafka scheduler must run on
> the active mesos-master leader, which may also be an indication of another
> symptom that just *happens* to coincide with this.
>
> >
> >others,
> >
> >Is there any alternative for getting kafka up and running on mesos  other
> than this -
> >mesos/kafka <https://github.com/mesos/kafka> ?
> >
>
> I thought about this for a while, but digging into the code, this is just
> an extension of MesosFramework, which is core mesos functionality.
>
> We’re either missing something or have exposed a bug.
>
> Of course, a person could just run kafka brokers with marathon, but I
> think this is worth the trouble and is fundamentally how things should be
> done.
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's
> confidential business and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely
> for the addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail message by
> anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. The sender
> believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any virus, worm,
> Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message and its
> attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the
> message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full
> responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and
> other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage
> arising in any way.
>



-- 
~Vinit

Reply via email to