Thanks for the feedback!
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Zhitao Li <zhitaoli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to both A to B.
> Do we plan to eventually drop non-checkpionted framework support (possibly
> in v2) and declare that all frameworks has to operate in this assumption?
I think that's worth considering for v2, *if* we don't find anyone
that has good reasons for disabling checkpointing. But I'd expect it
is more likely we keep it around as an option that is disabled by