On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Joris Van Remoortere
<jo...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> It sounds like using a multi_hashmap for now allows you to clean up the
> code and avoid some bugs, without changing the existing behavior.

Because we want cache-like behavior (bounded size + LRU replacement),
this would require adding a new data structure, BoundedMultiHashMap
(https://reviews.apache.org/r/54178/). That seems like overkill to me,
for now.

> It would also be unfortunate if we said we were dis-allowing duplicate task
> ids but only catch some of the manifestations.

Definitely unfortunate, but I don't see an alternative, as long as we
continue to allow frameworks to freely choose their own task IDs.

Neil

Reply via email to