CentOS, Scientific Linux and RHEL all have GCC 5.3.1 and CentOS succeeded
for me so I expect everything to be fine. But just in case they distribute
a patched version or something, it'd be good to verify that it definitely
works!
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:46 PM Benjamin Hindman <b...@eecs.berkeley.edu>
wrote:

> +1
>
> We care about RHEL 6 / 7, anyone out there that has used a GCC 5 on these
> can help MPark out?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:23 PM Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I've added Fedora 23 and OS X Sierra to the spreadsheet.
> > I've also successfully compiled and ran `make check` with the following
> > distros:
> >
> >    - CentOS 6 / 7
> >    - Fedora 23
> >    - Ubuntu 12.04, 14.04, 15.04, 15.10, 16.04, 16.10
> >
> > I need help with:
> >
> >    - Scientific Linux 6 / 7 (Does anyone actually care?)
> >    - RHEL 6 / 7 (Does anyone actually care?)
> >
> > I think Apple Clang has some issues currently that I'll be looking into
> > myself.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > MPark
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:53 PM Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Can you also add info for OSX?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Michael Park <mp...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd like move us to C++14!
> > > >
> > > > The following I'd say are the important C++14 features for us:
> > > >
> > > >    - Generic lambdas: [](const auto& x) { /* ... */ }
> > > >    - Extended lambda captures: [x = move(x)]() { /* ... */ }
> > > >
> > > > The following are some features that would be helpful for
> > > libprocess/stout:
> > > >
> > > >    - Function return type deduction
> > > >    - Relaxed constexpr functions
> > > >    - std::integer_sequence + other meta-programming facilities
> > > >
> > > > The minimum GCC version would become 5, and minimum VS would be 2017
> > > > (deprecation of VS 2015 is already in progress). Clang 3.5 is our
> > current
> > > > minimum Clang and it already implements C++14 so there's nothing to
> do
> > > > there.
> > > >
> > > > As a bonus, we pick up the <regex> header which is C++11 but haven't
> > been
> > > > usable for us since it's not implemented in GCC 4.8.
> > > >
> > > > Here's the spreadsheet of available compilers from various distros
> and
> > > how
> > > > to get them:
> > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ocQ19Uv1d8wdb-
> > > > QL4fDRAiQ12gPQwL3cIAzuV0csYwM/edit#gid=0
> > > >
> > > > Please suggest more distros we should consider, and
> > > > provide feedback with your concerns!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > MPark
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to