Just a quick follow-up, the version was bumped to 1.65 in 469363d.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:51 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If it’s backwards compatible then let’s go for it.
> > On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Benno Evers <bev...@mesosphere.com> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > for those of you who were looking at our build infrastructure recently,
> > may have noticed that the unfortunate combination of the default
> > flag and the bundled boost version that contains code which generates a
> > warning regarding unused local typedefs has, over the last year, spawned
> > several workarounds including a hardcoded `-Wno-unused-local-typedefs`
> > flag, the abuse of the `-isystem` flag to disable warnings in third-party
> > dependencies and finally the `--disable-werror` option to not set
> > by default.
> > To finally get rid of the warning, we were considering upgrading the
> > bundled boost version to Boost 1.65 in this review chain:
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/62161/
> > As far as I'm aware, this change should be fully backwards-compatible for
> > people who are building against a non-bundled version of boost.
> > Would there be any objections or concerns from the community about this?
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Benno Evers
> > Software Engineer, Mesosphere
Software Engineer, Mesosphere