Why there is a separate pom.xml file in the release artifacts
directory to be VOTED on?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Kasper Sørensen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Metamodel
> version 4.3.6.
>
> Before the technical let me add a few motivations for doing the release at
> this time:
>
>  * Alberto has a patch ready (PR on GitHub) which changes FunctionType to
> be an interface instead of an enum. This will enable us to support scalar
> functions in the future. But on the short term it breaks drop-in backwards
> compatibility. Because of this we did NOT merge the patch yet, but we wish
> to do so and then go for a version 4.4.x going forward.
>  * We decided to soon stop Java 6 support. This would be the last Java 6
> compatible release, and so this is also a good time to bump to version 4.4.
>  * Of course, many nice improvements done, see CHANGES.md
>
> The Git tag to be voted on is MetaModel-4.3.6:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=metamodel.git;a=commit;h=f4d6de53803a47e6b6ad67f8043c073da3b5fbff
>
> The source artifact to be voted on is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-1010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.3.6/MetaModel-4.3.6-source-release.zip
>
> Parent directory (including MD5, SHA1 hashes etc.) of the source is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-1010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.3.6/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/kaspersor.asc
>
> Release engineer public key id: 1FE1C2F5
>
> The staging Maven repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-1010
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.3.6.
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache MetaModel 4.3.6
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thank you in advance for participating.
>
> Regards,
> Kasper Sørensen

Reply via email to