That indeed sounds very interesting Kasper. Let me know how I can help :)

Best Regards,
Hosur Narahari

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Alberto Rodriguez <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That sounds very interesting Kasper.
>
> Looking forward to attending your talk ;)
>
> 2015-08-23 22:36 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]
> >:
>
> > Although this didn't seem to catch the immediate attention of anyone, I
> > anyways need a good example use-case for my Apache: Big Data talk so I
> made
> > a prototype of a system like this. If anyone's interested the code can be
> > found on my github account [1] and later on I might suggest it for
> > inclusion in MetaModel if people seem to like it :)
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/kaspersorensen/ApacheBigDataMetaModelExample
> >
> > 2015-07-01 8:36 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > In Human Inference we have an idea/requirement to make it possible to
> > > remotely explore metadata and fire queries towards a DataContext that
> is
> > > bound to a specific server machine. The idea is that it should be
> > possible
> > > for clients to also access this DataContext, but obviously since the
> > > context is bound to the server, it would have to be via some web
> service
> > or
> > > other remoting technology. While I was sketching out what was needed to
> > do
> > > this I kinda realized that this could actually be something we make
> > > available as a general MetaModel module instead that we build a one-off
> > for
> > > our specific application.
> > >
> > > So first question I guess is: Do you think such a feature would be a
> good
> > > addition to MetaModel?
> > >
> > > Onto the design of it ... I imagine that in the MetaModel perspective
> we
> > > could make abstract servlets, controllers or something like that, which
> > the
> > > application developers could then quite easily adapt and expose the
> > > DataContext that they wish from.  I would personally prefer if they are
> > > REST based. So we could even consider if we can make something JAX-RS
> > based
> > > or something like that.
> > >
> > > I imagine that for read-only access there would be at least two web
> > > services: 1) a schema web service and 2) a query web service. On the
> > server
> > > side this would expose data for the client to implement the
> getSchemas()
> > > and executeQuery(...) methods on a client-side DataContext
> > implementation.
> > >
> > > Of course there are always security concerns with something like this
> > too.
> > > My feeling is that if we make it in deed abstract then the application
> > > designers can judge what should be possible security-wise and so on.
> > >
> > > Please let me know what you think. I can be more specific if needed,
> but
> > I
> > > thought to first just present the general idea. In my opinion this
> could
> > be
> > > a pretty cool way to broaden the scope of MetaModel and open up for
> more
> > > data federation type use cases.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kasper
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to