[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15122371#comment-15122371
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METAMODEL-231:
------------------------------------------

GitHub user tomaszguzialek opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/88

    METAMODEL-231

    Reproduced METAMODEL-231 with an integration test as well as tested with 
Neo4j Sandbox (http://neo4j.com/sandbox). 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/tomaszguzialek/metamodel METAMODEL-231

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/88.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #88
    
----
commit 3c2f5bc4034fd390fc56c5bf029c0b498a2ef404
Author: Tomasz Guzialek <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-01-28T21:39:57Z

    Red test reproducing duplicated relationship properties.

commit 2c652c234c2590f98ddacbdbb2e5b68ec8c12ff1
Author: Tomasz Guzialek <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-01-28T21:49:46Z

    Using Set instead of a List to eliminate duplicates in relationship 
properties.

----


> Neo4j schema has too many relationship tables
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: METAMODEL-231
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-231
>             Project: Apache MetaModel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Claudia Pesu
>            Assignee: Tomasz Guzialek
>         Attachments: Neo4jSchema.png
>
>
> I have tested metamodel Neo4j connector in DataCleaner using the example 
> neo4j graph database "Movies" from the Neo4j sandbox(they have it on the 
> website). 
> The schema of the database contained too many(more than 20) relationships 
> tables with the same content 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to