Hi Michael,

I've honestly just been too busy privately to spend the time to review it.
I would love to do so and hope the wait can be less frustrating. Also, I
was trying to wrap my head around the process of creating a subproject and
taking large contributions like yours into the project. Anyway, if you can,
hold on. And feel free to take it further and so on. I'm just a bit pressed
with time at the moment (work, summer, family, other project duties etc.)
and I'm sure a lot of people feel the same.

Best regards,
Kasper

2017-07-14 17:04 GMT-07:00 Echopraxium <[email protected]>:

> Hello
>
> I didn't receive any feedback regarding the 'early bud' porting of AMM in
> C# .Net Core.
> Maybe I completely missed the target, or the project is too tiny to raise
> any interest.
> Anyway, I would appreciate some feedback, like 'you made a überly useless
> crap' or 'you did it the wrong way' or 'your attempt shows that porting to
> C# isa waste of time' or 'Java To C# translators do a much better job than
> you' etc..
> I opted for a kind of 'brute force' approach (in the sense that I did not
> study thouroughly the codebase, not even trying to use it to get a feel of
> it). But for each conversion issue, I searched what was said about it in
> dev forums (like Stack Overflow etc..).Then I documented the conversions
> found or crafted on the way. When I found AMM, at the first place I thought
> that I may benefit from this innovative solution by just 'copying the good
> ideas' but in a closed source project. Then I realized that it maybe in
> fact an opportunity to contribute to a great project and a way to 'give
> back' to the Apache foundation which published so many solid and
> worldwidely solutions.
> Now I'm really frustrated by the lack of feedback (and worse I'm afraid of
> very rude critics toward the 'brute force' approach)
> Anyway I hope the best for this project and its contributors.
>
> Best Regards
> Michel Kern (echopraxium)
>

Reply via email to