Great, thanks for the input guys. Sounds like we're agreeing on version *5.2.0* then.
@Arjan please let us know how much time you're talking about and what you're doing and finding :-) Den tir. 4. dec. 2018 kl. 00.58 skrev Alberto Rodriguez <[email protected]>: > I would bump to 5.2.0 taking into account the updated deps to be JDK8-11 > compatible. > > El mar., 4 dic. 2018 a las 8:10, Arjan Seijkens (<[email protected] > >) > escribió: > > > I think releasing is a good idea. I'm personally still testing the latest > > java 9 through 11 related changes and maybe will come up with some > findings > > based on those changes. So I would like a little time for that. > > > > I personally think 5.2.0 would be the best option for the version, > because > > the introduction of java 9 through 11 support is quite a step up from my > > perspective. > > > > Kind regards, > > Arjan Seijkens > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 5:54 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: I'd like to release. You agree? And what should we name the > > version? > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to release MetaModel rather soon. In the current master branch > we > > have these two changes ready: > > > > * [METAMODEL-1205] - Updated build and dependencies to be JDK8-11 > > compatible. Important updates include Guava, POI, Cassandra, Hadoop. > > * [METAMODEL-1206] - Solved Maven version dependent unit test issues in > > ElasticSearch-native module. > > > > They're both pretty much internal, except that the dependency updates are > > going to be pretty significant for anyone upgrading from version 5.1.0 > (or > > other recent releases) as their transitive dependencies will likely get > > upgraded as well. > > > > So that brings up the quesion about what to name a new release. On one > > hand it's almost a non-functional upgrade, so we could go with version > name > > *5.1.1*. on the other hand it updates the supported and required versions > > of dependencies a lot. So I think I personally think it should be version > > *5.2.0*. What do you think? > > > > - Kasper > > >
