The first release is typically the most painful one you'll ever do. :)

On 4 December 2013 18:21, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> wrote:
> I apologize forgot to mention this in rc1 attempt =(
>
> Once we get the first release under ASF I believe it would be much
> easier more later releases. Thanks for being patience guys
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Ankit,
>>
>> The link is for publishing maven artifacts bit in this case we need to Vote
>> on source jars because Apache only officially vote on source files. As Noah
>> mentioned you need to put the source files into your people.apache.org
>> public URL.
>>
>> Please take a look at Apache Spark vote thread:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201309.mbox/%3CCABPQxsu6XwYMUxWKwRsXOvT+3-8=TTWwyHwJe_hWVb=npxw...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013, Ankit Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Noah,
>>>
>>> The release procedure followed is standard Apache release process. I have
>>> followed steps as documented here: -
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#dev-env
>>>
>>> Since there were not any project specific setting/steps I did not make a
>>> new WIKI.
>>>
>>> I shared the public key link as that was in the Vote thread template I
>>> received from Henry. My key ID is B68FA0EF.
>>>
>>> Regarding the artifacts, the link I shared is the staging repository link
>>> under which all the artifacts are available as jar/archives etc and they
>>> are signed by my key. This is what comes out automatically by the Apache
>>> release process. In the first attempt Vote thread received some feedback
>>> remarks from Arvind but he did mention the signature and md5 checks passed
>>> on the artifacts.
>>>
>>> P.S. Excuse me if I don't really understand you as this is the first time
>>> I
>>> do an Apache release.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ankit
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Do you have your release procedure written down on the wiki somewhere?
>>> > I'd like to look at it.
>>> >
>>> > We should prepare some test instructions on the wiki and link to that
>>> > too, so people voting know what to check for.
>>> >
>>> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>> >
>>> > I would prefer it if you gave the key ID and let me fetch it myself
>>> > with gpg --recv-keys.
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>> >
>>> > We cannot vote on this. We can only vote on a prepared source
>>> > artefact, like a zip file. This file is what should be signed by your
>>> > GPG key.
>>> >
>>> > You mention "release artefact" in your email though, so maybe I am
>>> > missing something?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > On 3 December 2013 16:05, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > Hi All,
>>> > >
>>> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>>> > > Metamodel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>>> > > This will be the first incubator release for MetaModel project in
>>> > > Apache.
>>> > > NOTE: This release contains fixes for issues as reported in the first
>>> > > release attempt vote thread.
>>> > >
>>> > > The tag to be voted on is v4.0.0-incubating :
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>> > >
>>> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>> > >
>>> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel
>>> > 4.0.0-incubating.
>>> > > The vote is open until <6th December 2013 16:00 CET> and passes if a
>>> > > majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>>> > >
>>> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating
>>> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards
>>> > > Ankit
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Noah Slater
>>> > https://twitter.com/nslater
>>> >



-- 
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater

Reply via email to