Hi Ankit, I think it would be good for you to send to general@ list. Please do look at examples of emails sent to the general@ list from other podlings to send VOTE email to release artifacts.
Thanks for driving this. - Henry On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mentors, > > Should i send the vote to general@ email address or would anyone amongst > you do it? > > Regards > Ankit > On Dec 31, 2013 11:55 AM, "Matt Franklin" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> When you send the vote to general@ you need to indicate which of the +1s >> came from IPMC members. >> >> Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse typos or brevity. >> >> > On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:12, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > [RESULT] for the [VOTE] thread Apache Metamodel release 4.0.0-incubating. >> > >> > +1 >> > Henry Saputra >> > Juan Jose van der linden >> > Arvind Prabhakar >> > Matt Franklin >> > Kasper Sorensen >> > Ankit Kumar >> > Hans Drexler >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > Ankit >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Ok, so next step please send RESULT thread reply to the VOTE thread to >> >> tally up the vote so we could bring the VOTE to the >> >> [email protected] list to get final look or reviews by >> >> incubating community and IPMCs. >> >> >> >> After that please send the same VOTE thread to >> >> [email protected] and link to the RESULT thread for review. >> >> >> >> - Henry >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Kasper Sørensen >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Register the tickets and finalize the release :-) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2013/12/25 Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>>> Hi All, >> >>>> >> >>>> I guess we should make a ticket for fixing the headers in tests and >> > make it >> >>>> mandatory for next release. >> >>>> >> >>>> Lets make this our first release if all agree. >> >>>> >> >>>> Regards >> >>>> Ankit >> >>>> On Dec 24, 2013 8:31 PM, "Henry Saputra" <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hmm I missed that exclude comment you made before. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> @Ankit could you verify if we could fix the java test classes quickly >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> On Tuesday, December 24, 2013, Matt Franklin wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Yes and the ticket to fix the license headers on test Java files. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Henry Saputra < >> >>>> [email protected] >> >>>>> <javascript:;> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Hi Matt, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Are you talking about config to ignore target classes and >> > generated >> >>>>>> files? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> - Henry >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Monday, December 23, 2013, Matt Franklin wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> If the tickets got created to update the RAT config, I will >> > vote +1 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Ankit Kumar < >> >>>>> [email protected]<javascript:;> >> >>>>>>> <javascript:;> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> We still need 1 more IPMC vote to promote this release. >> > Please >> >>>>> review >> >>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>> provide your feedback. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Regards >> >>>>>>>>> Ankit >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Arvind Prabhakar < >> >>>>> [email protected]<javascript:;> >> >>>>>>> <javascript:;> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looks good to me too. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> >>>>>>>>>> Arvind Prabhakar >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Henry Saputra < >> >>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Looks good >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> - Henry >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Ankit Kumar < >> >>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> After some discussions and agreements here I send >> > again the >> >>>>>> VOTE >> >>>>>>>>>>>> thread, additionally added the location of the sources >> > as >> >>>> in >> >>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>> staging repository. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as >> > Apache >> >>>>>>>>>>>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel >> > in >> >>>>>> Apache. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is >> >>>>>>>>>>>> v4.0.0-incubating: >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key: >> >>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found >> >>>>>>>>>>>> at: >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/ >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Source jars can be found here: >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/ >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache >> > MetaModel >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0-incubating. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open until <17th December 2013 00:00 CET> >> > and >> >>>>>> passes >> >>>>>>>> if a >> >>>>>>>>>>>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit >> >>>> >>
