And thanks to Henry for letting us know about the new review board we
have...

This same branch diff can be reviewed here now:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16680/


2014/1/5 Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]>

> Hi all,
>
> I've made a remote branch called 'spring-module' to represent the attempt
> at fixing issue METAMODEL-11 which is about having a spring FactoryBean
> available for constructing DataContext objects based on variable factory
> properties [1].
>
> It so far works for JDBC, CSV and Excel DataContexts. Would appreciate any
> kind of review or thoughts on the approach.
>
> To get an idea of how it would work from a Spring POV, it will make sense
> to take a look at the testcases. These read files from the folder
> spring/src/test/resources/examples [2] ...
>
> Some questions:
>  * Could we make this more extensible somehow, so it would be possible to
> plug in other datacontext types than those we have out of the box? Is that
> desirable/important?
>  * Would the current style of implementation work if some dependencies are
> missing at runtime. For instance, would it work for a CSV DataContext when
> MetaModel-excel is not on the classpath, or does the imports in the top of
> the factory bean class require ALL modules to be available on classpath? If
> so, that's kinda unfortunate...
>
> Kind regards,
> Kasper
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-11
> [2]
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tree;f=spring/src/test/resources/examples;h=130605d4286dd68c5b2e8acc3c2cdd2a8f0d5b6a;hb=refs/heads/spring-module
>

Reply via email to