On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's and no 0 or -1
> votes.
>
> +1 (4 Total)
> Henry Saputra
> Juan Jose van der linden
> Arvind Prabhakar
> Matt Franklin
>
> 0 (0 Total)
>
> -1 (0 Total)
>
> * = Binding Vote
>
> The vote thread can be found here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-metamodel-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAAHPopELo0OJx_rR6kGNjppKLMbFjw-%2BE8XyH68ds31%3DxD4t-A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped with this release.
Hi,
I found this message confusing at first because it refers to the result of the
dev@metamodel VOTE thread, but appears to presents the result as final. It
seems that the MetaModel Mentors are on top of things, though:
http://s.apache.org/oql (Henry Saputra)
Ok, so next step please send RESULT thread reply to the VOTE thread to
tally up the vote so we could bring the VOTE to the
[email protected] list to get final look or reviews by
incubating community and IPMCs.
To reinforce Henry, here's a relevant excerpt from the Incubator's policy on
releases:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least
three +1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page). If the
majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary
of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the
Incubator PMC approve such a release. Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are
required.
So, although there are 4 IPMC +1 votes, the full IPMC has not yet been given
an opportunity to review the release candidate.
Marvin Humphrey
