Github user mattf-horton commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/641#discussion_r126849654
  
    --- Diff: 
metron-stellar/stellar-common/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/stellar/dsl/functions/HashFunctionsTest.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.metron.stellar.dsl.functions;
    +
    +import com.google.common.io.BaseEncoding;
    +import org.apache.commons.lang.SerializationUtils;
    +import org.junit.Test;
    +
    +import java.io.Serializable;
    +import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;
    +import java.security.MessageDigest;
    +import java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException;
    +import java.security.Security;
    +import java.util.Arrays;
    +import java.util.Collections;
    +import java.util.HashMap;
    +import java.util.Map;
    +import java.util.Set;
    +
    +import static 
org.apache.metron.stellar.common.utils.StellarProcessorUtils.run;
    +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
    +import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
    +
    +public class HashFunctionsTest {
    +  final HashFunctions.Hash hash = new HashFunctions.Hash();
    +
    +  @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
    +  public void nullArgumentListShouldThrowException() throws Exception {
    +    hash.apply(null);
    +  }
    +
    +  @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
    +  public void emptyArgumentListShouldThrowException() throws Exception {
    +    hash.apply(Collections.emptyList());
    +  }
    +
    +  @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
    +  public void singleArgumentListShouldThrowException() throws Exception {
    +    hash.apply(Collections.singletonList("some value."));
    +  }
    +
    +  @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
    +  public void argumentListWithMoreThanTwoValuesShouldThrowException3() 
throws Exception {
    +    hash.apply(Arrays.asList("1", "2", "3"));
    +  }
    +
    +  @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
    +  public void argumentListWithMoreThanTwoValuesShouldThrowException4() 
throws Exception {
    +    hash.apply(Arrays.asList("1", "2", "3", "4"));
    +  }
    +
    +  @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
    +  public void invalidAlgorithmArgumentShouldThrowException() throws 
Exception {
    +    hash.apply(Arrays.asList("value to hash", "invalidAlgorithm"));
    +  }
    +
    +  @Test
    +  public void invalidNullAlgorithmArgumentShouldThrowException() throws 
Exception {
    +    assertNull(hash.apply(Arrays.asList("value to hash", null)));
    +  }
    +
    +  @Test
    +  public void nullInputForValueToHashShouldProperlyThrowException() throws 
Exception {
    +    assertNull(hash.apply(Arrays.asList(null, "md5")));
    +  }
    --- End diff --
    
    Ah, I was trusting your very detailed testcase names :-)  If they don't 
throw exceptions then of course the annotation should be consistent.
    
    I remain of the opinion that it would be good for HASH to be able to return 
a conforming result for null objects, ie "00" instead of null.  But this is 
mostly an aesthetic judgment on my part, so I could be talked out of it.
    
    You gave me a headache by prefixing the "00" string with the unicode symbol 
:-) and no, "\u0000" would not be the desirable return value; that would be the 
unicode codepoint for a single null character.  Yuck!  But I shouldn't have 
used the hex prefix "0x" either.  Since we are returning unadorned string 
values representing hex values, it should be "00" (a pair of zero digit 
characters in a String of length 2).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to