Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
    --- Diff: 
bundles-lib/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/bundles/bundle/ ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.metron.bundles.bundle;
    + * Represents a bundle that contains one or more extensions.
    + */
    +public class Bundle {
    +    private final BundleDetails bundleDetails;
    +    private final ClassLoader classLoader;
    +    public Bundle(final BundleDetails bundleDetails, final ClassLoader 
classLoader) {
    +        this.bundleDetails = bundleDetails;
    +        this.classLoader = classLoader;
    +        if (this.bundleDetails == null) {
    +            throw new IllegalStateException("BundleDetails cannot be 
    +        }
    +        if (this.classLoader == null) {
    +            throw new IllegalStateException("ClassLoader cannot be null");
    --- End diff --
    The overall goal was just to ensure that if any code later on encounters a 
Bundle, it can be sure that the details and class loader are present. There 
isn't a realistic case in NiFi where you should encounter these exceptions, it 
was just being defensive.
    I think I got in the habit of using IllegalStateException here since at 
this point you are checking the member variables of the object and saying that 
something in the state of the object is not valid, as opposed to checking the 
arguments before assigning them which would maybe better to use 

If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.

Reply via email to