I think the codelab build might be more Metron archeologist! +1 to a big old clearout, especially on the wiki.
> On 6 Oct 2017, at 13:57, Nick Allen <n...@nickallen.org> wrote: > > I doubt it has been run in a long, long time. It was originally created > for some Meetups that we did early on in the project. Useful then, but not > any longer. It might have even predated Quick Dev. > > FYI - We have an opening for Metron Team Historian. Send a cover letter, > CV and $150 application fee to me for consideration. :) > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:52 AM Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What is the point of that anyway? It just looks like full dev with no >> skipTags? That seems like it should just be documented that you can run >> with Vagrant with '--ansible-skip-tags'? We probably should document any >> tags you might want to skip anyway. >> >> I'm pretty in favor of killing that. >> >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Nick Allen <n...@nickallen.org> wrote: >> >>> The same case might be made for the Code Lab Platform >>> `metron-deployment/vagrant/codelab-platform`? >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:44 AM Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Wiki updated. It now points to full dev and the link just says "Dev >>>> Platform" >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Nick Allen <n...@nickallen.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 To killing Quick Dev and updating the Wiki. Quick Dev has been >>> broken >>>>> for eons. Simon's point about "profusion of installs" makes a lot of >>>> sense >>>>> too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:33 AM Simon Elliston Ball < >>>>> si...@simonellistonball.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 we see a lot of people struggling with the profusion of install >>> and >>>>> run >>>>>> methods as it is, if we can reduce that surface area, life will be >> a >>>> lot >>>>>> easier on the user list. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6 Oct 2017, at 13:28, zeo...@gmail.com <zeo...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I say we kill it and repoint the site. That will give us one >> less >>>>> thing >>>>>> to >>>>>>> upgrade to centos 7 as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017, 08:27 Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So what are we going to do with Quick Dev? I'm pretty sure >>>>> everybody's >>>>>>>> been using full dev for awhile now (and quick dev is probably >>> broken >>>>>> since >>>>>>>> I'm sure we haven't been regularly updating it). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just realized our website links to a wiki page that says to >> use >>>>> quick >>>>>>>> dev. Given that quick dev is broken or behind or both, this is >>>> going >>>>>> to be >>>>>>>> incredibly confusing and misleading to anyone wandering in. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A short term fix is to just point that wiki page to full dev, so >>> we >>>>>> aren't >>>>>>>> at least broken to anyone coming in. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After that we should figure out what we're doing with quick and >>> full >>>>> dev >>>>>>>> and take care of whatever needs to be done. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Justin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jon >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
