+1 binding

I validated the release with Otto's script.  All integration tests and
license checks passed.  Also, ran the release up in the CentOS dev
environment.  I validated alerts were hitting the Alerts UI and the Service
Check completed successfully.



On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 binding
> Ran the script
> Validated ui + data in ambari/storm/config ui
>
>
>
> On May 31, 2018 at 14:35:20, Justin Leet (justinjl...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> This includes a couple fixes from master, in particular two issues that
> were problematic, METRON-1586
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1586> and METRON-1544
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1544>.
>
> Justin
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Justin Leet <l...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.5.0
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/metron/0.5.0-RC2/CHANGES
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is:
> >
> > (apache/metron) apache-metron-0.5.0-rc2
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/metron/0.5.0-RC2/apac
> > he-metron-0.5.0-rc2.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/metron/0.5.0-RC2/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/metron/0.5.0-RC2/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.5.0-RC2
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >
> > Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
> > here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
> >
> > This vote will be open until 3pm EDT on Tuesday June 5 2018, to account
> > for the weekend.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.5.0-RC2
> >
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
>

Reply via email to