Hi Oliver

I still saw Meta alerts even when I was filtering for alerts = true but I am 
using an earlier version.

You may want to try filtering by score instead.  A meta-alert should have a 
non-zero score if it includes alerts.

Carolyn Duby
Solutions Engineer, Northeast
cd...@hortonworks.com
+1.508.965.0584

Join my team!
Enterprise Account Manager – Boston - http://grnh.se/wepchv1
Solutions Engineer – Boston - http://grnh.se/8gbxy41
Need Answers? Try https://community.hortonworks.com 
<https://community.hortonworks.com/answers/index.html>








On 7/2/18, 5:13 AM, "Oliver Fletcher" <oliver.fletc...@gresearch.co.uk> wrote:

>Hi Guys,
>
>
>I have a quick question regarding the usability of meta-alerts within the 
>investigator UI. We have a high(ish) volume log source (firewall logs, with 
>accept packets being logged). Threat intelligence feeds will match connections 
>to rouge IP addresses and the investigator UI is showing hits with a threat 
>score as advertised.
>
>
>The issue I'm experiencing is that I have to place a filter 'is_alert:true' 
>within the search bar, otherwise I'll pull in millions of non-interesting 
>events. This view gives me a powerful threat score alert feed, however, when I 
>merge together a group of alerts into a meta-alert, it will not appear in this 
>filtered search any more (because I've specified 'is_alert:true'). If I remove 
>this filter I'll have to trundle through a few billion events to find the 
>meta-alert! It's effectively disappeared into the ether.
>
>
>Have I implemented this abnormally? It seems that the investigator UI could do 
>with an implicit is_alert:true filter? Then allowing meta-grouped alerts to 
>float into this implicit search base?
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Oliver Fletcher
>
>?
>
>--------------
>G-RESEARCH believes the information provided herein is reliable. While every 
>care has been taken to ensure accuracy, the information is furnished to the 
>recipients with no warranty as to the completeness and accuracy of its 
>contents and on condition that any errors or omissions shall not be made the 
>basis of any claim, demand or cause of action.
>The information in this email is intended only for the named recipient.  If 
>you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately and do not 
>copy, distribute or take action based on this e-mail.
>All messages sent to and from this e-mail address will be logged by G-RESEARCH 
>and are subject to archival storage, monitoring, review and disclosure.
>G-RESEARCH is the trading name of Trenchant Limited, 5th Floor, Whittington 
>House, 19-30 Alfred Place, London WC1E 7EA.
>Trenchant Limited is a company registered in England with company number 
>08127121.
>--------------

Reply via email to