All good suggestions.  I don't think I'll personally have time in the short
term to draft a release discussion email, but I do think it's a good idea.

I can take a stab at the README link to contributing and a PR template for
the plugin repo.

Jon

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 8:09 AM Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Should we just put out a discuss for releasing in general, with this
> discussion noted?  The outcome of the release cadence discussion was to put
> out a thread around each board report. I believe that's a few days from
> now, so it's good timing. As an aside, part of the post release activities
> for the plugin should probably be upping the plugin version in the main
> repo to use the new version.
>
> While we're on the topic, is there anything else we should do to improve
> the plugin repo?  Off the top of my head, setting up a version of the PR
> template would be helpful.  Maybe adding a section to the README.md linking
> to the CONTRIBUTING.md of the main repo?
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 11:14 AM Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It is INFRA, see INFRA-17091 for example.
>>
>>
>> On October 12, 2018 at 20:47:24, zeo...@gmail.com (zeo...@gmail.com)
>> wrote:
>>
>> So it seems that the last commit before the 0.2 release of
>> metron-bro-plugin-kafka broke the one basic unit test that we had. Since
>> metron 0.6.0 pins to 0.1
>> <
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/metron/blob/Metron_0.6.0/metron-deployment/ansible/roles/bro/vars/main.yml#L30
>> >
>>
>> this wouldn't cause an obvious issue if you spun up the sensors in
>> full-dev, and even if we were to point metron to 0.2 of the plugin we
>> wouldn't have necessarily seen the issue because we do a --force
>> <
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/metron/blob/Metron_0.6.0/metron-deployment/ansible/roles/bro/tasks/metron-bro-plugin-kafka.yml#L35
>> >
>>
>> to remove interaction.
>>
>> After we get a chance to review/merge a recent PR
>> <https://github.com/apache/metron-bro-plugin-kafka/pull/2>, we should
>> have
>> a few more 'actual' unit tests, and I would like to get travis setup for
>> the repo <https://travis-ci.org/apache/metron-bro-plugin-kafka> to
>> actually
>> check those (PR incoming) so it's less likely this sort of thing would
>> happen again. However, it doesn't appear I have the right permissions to
>> be able to get travis moving on my own. Does anybody else have the right
>> access, or is this an asf infrastructure ticket?
>>
>> I'd also like us to consider doing a 0.3 release for the plugin so we
>> aren't distributing something that has broken tests. Thoughts on that?
>>
>> Jon
>> --
>>
>> Jon
>>
> --

Jon

Reply via email to