That is correct - this was/is handled in the feature branch. On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 7:35 AM Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Someone working more on the feature branch can correct me if I'm wrong, but > I believe that's occurring as part of the general "Upgrade HDP version" > branch, since that involves a lot of major upgrades to more supported > versions of basically all the components. Specifically, it looks like it > occurs here > < > https://github.com/apache/metron/commit/ad71c0468888977f1b3ab1aa58fea38b846a1e37 > > > . > > Having said that, especially for feature branches, having more eyes on it > is generally pretty helpful if you're interested in hopping in to catch any > issues or opportunities. I believe the people most involved are Mike > Miklavcic, Nick Allen, and Ryan Merriman, so they may have some more > input or have seen some opportunities if you're looking to contribute > something there. > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 2:46 AM Dale Richardson <tigerqu...@outlook.com> > wrote: > > > At the moment, Metron currently ships with Solr 6.6.2 support (I think > > that matches HDP Search 3). > > Horton Works HDP Search 4 and 5 is based off Apache Solr 7.4 > > Cloudera search is based off Apache Solr 7.4 as well. > > Lucidworks Solr is based on 7.x, soon to be 8.x (if not already) - they > > always seem to push the bleeding edge with SOLR in production. > > > > Does anybody have any issues if I upgrade the bundled SOLR support to > Solr > > 7.4? I'm hoping most people that use Metron/Solr in production use a > > supported distribution, and thus we should try and keep up with the > > supported Solr versions as much as possible. > > > > Regards, > > Dale. > > >
