+1 RTC On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 13:57 Charles Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 RTC > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:55 AM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Given what seems to be support for RTC here is my +1. > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:53 PM, George Vetticaden < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 for Review-Then-Commit > > > > > > -- > > > George VetticadenPrincipal, COE > > > [email protected] > > > (630) 909-9138 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/8/15 1:52 PM, "Mark Bittmann" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >+1 for Review-Then-Commit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On 12/8/15, 2:50 PM, "Andrew Hartnett" <[email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >>+1 for Review-Then-Commit > > > >> > > > >>Andrew Hartnett > > > >>Sr. Dev Warlord - Rackspace Managed Security > > > >>210.744.4101 > > > >> > > > >>________________________________________ > > > >>From: Sean Schulte <[email protected]> > > > >>Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 1:49 PM > > > >>To: [email protected] > > > >>Subject: COMMERCIAL:Re: COMMERCIAL:[VOTE] Commit-Then-Review or > > > >>Review-Then-Commit > > > >> > > > >>+1 for Review-Then-Commit > > > >> > > > >>> On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:48 PM, James Sirota <[email protected]> > > > >>>wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> +1 for review then commit > > > > > > > > >
