Clarification: by access I meant ability to edit the wiki.

On 12/13/15, 8:27 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Gr8 idea. However many folks on the list don’t have access to the wiki. Is
>there a process to get that access?
>
>debo
>
>On 12/13/15, 5:12 AM, "George Vetticaden" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>Going forward, lets start documenting meeting notes here:
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Meeting+Minutes
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>George VetticadenPrincipal, COE
>>[email protected]
>>(630) 909-9138
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 12/12/15 8:24 AM, "George Vetticaden" <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Team,
>>>
>>>Here are the meeting minutes from our first requirements meeting.
>>>For a first meeting, I believe it was productive.
>>>
>>>You can also find the notes from the meeting here:
>>>http://tinyurl.com/oehgnep
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Meeting Summary--------
>>>
>>>Discussion of various requirements for Metron. We reviewed the following
>>>docs: 
>>>
>>>1. Discover reviewed the following requirement doc:
>>>https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?cid=e12c061b74681e7c&page=view&resid
>>>=
>>>E
>>>1
>>>2C061B74681E7C!5700&parId=E12C061B74681E7C!5694&authkey=!ANEjQgPa9cgzVts
>>>&
>>>a
>>>p
>>>p=Excel 
>>>
>>>
>>>2. George reviewed the following requirement doc:
>>>https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?cid=e12c061b74681e7c&page=view&resid
>>>=
>>>E
>>>1
>>>2C061B74681E7C!5699&parId=E12C061B74681E7C!5694&authkey=!ANEjQgPa9cgzVts
>>>&
>>>a
>>>p
>>>p=Word 
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>------Attendees-----------
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>Discover Gerdes - Rackspace
>>>
>>>George Vetticaden - Hortonworks
>>>
>>>James Sirota - Hortonworks
>>>
>>>Noreen Santini - Hortonworks
>>>
>>>Oskar Zabik - Rackspace
>>>
>>>Mark Bittmann - b23
>>>
>>>Debo Dutta  - Cisco
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>--------Notes-----------
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>1. Need to come up with Taxonomy for Metron so everyone is speaking the
>>>same language. Need to finalize and define terms such as:
>>>
>>>     1. Event 
>>>
>>>     2. Alert 
>>>
>>>     3. Incident 
>>>
>>>     4. Asset 
>>>
>>>     5. Risk 
>>>
>>>     6. Threat 
>>>
>>>     7. Urgency 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>2. For Rackspace, multi-tenancy requirements will be key. They will have
>>>multiple customers using shared infrastructure where data will need to
>>>flow into a single Metron cluster. So being able to identify an event
>>>associated with a specific customer are critical.
>>>
>>>3. Different Personas of the users of the system include:
>>>
>>>     1. Junior Security Analyst
>>>
>>>     2. Senior Security Analyst
>>>
>>>     3. Admin 
>>>
>>>     4. Customer Facing / Executives
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>4. Alerting Management Requirements
>>>
>>>     1. Suppress an Alert Temporarily and time based (suppress for 24 hours)
>>>
>>>     2. Suppress an Alert Permanently
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>5. Need examples of correlation and SIEM rules
>>>
>>>6. Ability to search, pivot and build complex queries via UI (pivoting
>>>and
>>>clicking) will be important. E.g: Select a "Watchlisted Threat Alert",
>>>then click on Details, Select Destination Souce --> Right click and do
>>>Search as Source IP --> executes  a Search
>>>
>>>7. Approach to Requirements and Design
>>>
>>>     1. For Legacy SIM functionality --> Start with UI requirements and
>>>drive
>>>platform requirement
>>>
>>>     2. For Next Analytical functionality --> Start with Analytics and then
>>>drive UI requirement
>>>
>>>
>>>8. What Next? 
>>>
>>>     1. Need to create Customer Survey and send to SOC teams to collect and
>>>prioritize requirements
>>>
>>>     2. From requirements, create some wireframes
>>>
>>>     3. With wireframes, conduct "interviews" with various SOC teams with
>>>wireframes 
>>>
>>>     4. Iterate on requirements and wireframes.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>------Post-Meeting Followup/Action Item--------
>>>
>>>     1. George: Send out meeting minutes.
>>>
>>>     2. George: Send out shared doc for Customer Survey
>>>
>>>     3. George: Schedule weekly Requirements meeting invite every Thursday
>>>from 9 CST - 10:30 CST
>>>
>>>     4. Noreen and Oskar: Meet on UI and Customer Survey , start wireframes
>>>and then publish out meeting minutes to apache metron dev team
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>George Vetticaden
>>>Principal, COE 
>>>[email protected]
>>>(630) 909-9138
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 12/10/15 10:28 PM, "James Sirota" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Based on demand let¹s do WebEx
>>>>
>>>>Here is a link:
>>>>
>>>>https://hortonworks.webex.com/hortonworks/j.php?MTID=m8273c3ef30a61911c
>>>>9
>>>>f
>>>>7
>>>>e897c57c752a
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 12/8/15, 6:02 PM, "Andrew Hartnett" <[email protected]>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>James didn't add enough info to the email.  We are planning on a
>>>>>meeting
>>>>>Friday at 9am CST to discuss plans for the UI.  James' ask for
>>>>>participants is to gauge which medium to hold the meeting.  Since wire
>>>>>frames and other visual discussions are needed, we are looking at
>>>>>holding a Webex or another video conf.  Any recommendations that come
>>>>>from this will be pushed to Jira.
>>>>>
>>>>>Andrew Hartnett
>>>>>Sr. Dev Warlord - Rackspace Managed Security
>>>>>210.744.4101
>>>>>
>>>>>________________________________________
>>>>>From: P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 4:18 PM
>>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>>Subject: COMMERCIAL:Re: [DISCUSS] UI Requirements Meeting
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2015, at 3:59 PM, James Sirota <[email protected]>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We will have a meeting to discuss the initial UI requirements for
>>>>>>Metron.  If you want to participate please respond to this thread and
>>>>>>we¹ll send
>>>>>
>>>>>Is there a reason the invite couldn¹t be sent to the whole dev@ list?
>>>>>
>>>>>I would also suggest proposing a date/time a few days in advance so
>>>>>those in various time zones have enough notice to attend.
>>>>>
>>>>>And as Owen pointed out in another thread, only discussions and
>>>>>recommendations can come from any such meeting. Any decisions have to
>>>>>be
>>>>>made on the mailing lists.
>>>>>
>>>>>-Taylor
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to