Maybe some decent shield and a bunch of bad streams hitting the shield?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 27, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Casey Stella <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Not a clear suggestion, but I was thinking maybe something like a circular
> shield with swords?  That or like a viking shield wall, maybe?
> 
> Just spitballing.
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Casey Stella <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I agree, this looks way too much like metasploit.
>> 
>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Nick Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I do like option 1 and 2, but in my opinion they are too similar to
>>> Metasploit for us to use.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Houshang Livian <[email protected]
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Please send me any ideas of what you would like me to create.
>>>> 
>>>> Here a few new ideas for consideration:
>>>> 
>>>> Option #1: Metron Shield in Blood Orange
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/fqzdya56d2ax23e/Metron-Logo-Submits-1.jpg?dl=0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Option #2: Metron Tower in Sky Blue
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/4uz7m0n31fip4w8/Metron-Logo-Submits-2.jpg?dl=0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Option #3: Owl Shield in Sky Blue
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/v2jwqoji5xx951e/Metron-Logo-Submits-3.jpg?dl=0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 4/26/16, 7:14 AM, "Casey Stella" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm late to the party, but I strongly come down on the side of
>>> focusing in
>>>>> the near-term on the thing that we do well, which is security
>>> analytics.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:47 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 (though off-topic)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would suggest metron focus on the core use cases it aims to
>>> address,
>>>> and
>>>>>> not attempt to become too generic. Be the best at a core set of use
>>>> cases.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My $.02.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2016, at 7:48 PM, George Vetticaden <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> IN my opinion, metron needs to be focused on Security and not
>>> become a
>>>>>>> generic ³real-time streams² or generic ³analytics framework², or
>>>> generic
>>>>>>> anything.Once you start to get into that territory, you are trying
>>> to
>>>>>> boil
>>>>>>> the ocean and it becomes very hard to focus on a problem at hand.
>>> From
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> very beginning as part of the incubation proposal, metro¹s aim was
>>> to
>>>>>>> become a security analytics framework and we shouldn¹t deviate from
>>>> that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> George Vetticaden
>>>>>>> Principal, Senior Product Manager for Cyber Security / Metron
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> (630) 909-9138
>>>>>>> Twitter: @gvetticaden
>>>>>>> Blog: http://hortonworks.com/blog/author/gvetticaden/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 4/25/16, 10:35 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi James
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Surely metron could remain a pure security pipeline and the logo
>>> then
>>>>>>>> needs to reflect that if the community wants it that way. Given
>>> the
>>>>>>>> earlier logos, none of them conveyed that meaning IMO. However it
>>> has
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> potential to be more generic if the community wants to keep the
>>>> option
>>>>>>>> open. Maybe we should have a discussion around that at some point?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Should we have new candidates that accurately reflect security, in
>>>> the
>>>>>>>> mean time?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> debo
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 4/25/16, 8:17 AM, "James Sirota" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I think Metron is intended for the security use case and there
>>> is no
>>>>>>>>> community discussion as far as I am aware to take it into a more
>>>>>> general
>>>>>>>>> direction.  I personally think Metron needs to stay security
>>> focused
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> focus on it¹s mission at hand.  I think the logo needs to
>>>> communicate a
>>>>>>>>> security message.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/19/16, 6:14 PM, "Houshang Livian" <[email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Dave Hirko and James,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> What did you want to communicate with the logo?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Houshang Livian
>>>>>>>>>> Senior User Experience Designer
>>>>>>>>>> Hortonworks
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> www.hortonworks.com<http://www.hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Mobile: (831) 521-4176<tel:(831)%20521-4176>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Agree w Charles around the generic notion of real time streams
>>> of
>>>>>> info.
>>>>>>>>>> Metron could be much more generic.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:50 PM, Charles Porter
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:
>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> This is the logo we agreed on in january:
>>>> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0ByxWQZe48HUHeVRmaWVYOHF1X3c#
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I personally like not using a shield. It is a little overused in
>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> context.
>>>>>>>>>> The logo from the January  vote suggests the mechanized
>>> watching of
>>>>>>>>>> flows
>>>>>>>>>> of vital information, which is really the fundamental
>>> capability of
>>>>>>>>>> Metron.
>>>>>>>>>> That is, its utility is really not limited to security.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> My .02
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> -Charles
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Houshang Livian
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Sheetal,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You designed the shield last time. Do you have any comments on
>>> the
>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>> ideas?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/19/16, 2:04 PM, "Sheetal Dolas"
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hoshang, these were the options proposed last time
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/QS0IITo.png
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Rita McKissick <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I agree that #1 looks very similar to Metasploit's logo.
>>> Although
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> castle wall is a good way to imply defense. I would prefer
>>>> something a
>>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>> more modern. My favorite remains #3. Maybe it would be helpful
>>> if
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> object above the M looks a bit more like a shield.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Rita
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Rita McKissick ! Sr. Technical Writer
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/18/16, 12:13 PM, "Houshang Livian"
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Apologies for the flood of emails. Here is a dropbox link for
>>> those
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> could not see the options:
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6hxz76aet8gzt0a/metron-logo-options.png?dl=0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> From: default
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>> hlivian@
>>>>>>>>>> hortonworks.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Reply-To:
>>>>>>>>>> "[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Monday, April 18, 2016 at 12:07 PM
>>>>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>>>>> "[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Metron Logo Options
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Trying again with the options as an attachment.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> From: default
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>> hlivian@
>>>>>>>>>> hortonworks.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Reply-To:
>>>>>>>>>> "[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Monday, April 18, 2016 at 12:05 PM
>>>>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>>>>> "[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Metron Logo Options
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hey Guys,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> As you know, Metron is based on a DC Comic Book character.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Here are 5 different logo options for Metron. Let me know your
>>>>>> thoughts
>>>>>>>>>> and your votes.
>>>>>>>>>> [cid:FC8299C6-AAAB-4CC2-9129-3C19479F1D8F]
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Houshang Livian
>>>>>>>>>> Senior User Experience Designer
>>>>>>>>>> Hortonworks
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> www.hortonworks.com<http://www.hortonworks.com><
>>>>>> http://www.hortonworks.c
>>>>>>>>>> om/>
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Mobile: (831) 521-4176<tel:(831)%20521-4176>
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:
>>>>>> HLivian@h
>>>>>>>>>> ortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Nick Allen <[email protected]>
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to