In addition it would need to add a set default timezone before processing
untagged data sources such as anything using RFC 3164.

On Fri, May 27, 2016, 13:40 Puzio, Domenic <[email protected]>
wrote:

> For me, I think this work needs to address two situations:
>
>
>
> 1. Data that is always coming from the same timezone. If a data source
> always has its timestamp in EST, then we need to add a static offset to
> each timestamp to make it UTC. Perhaps this could be a variable in the
> parser configs; I believe some parsers already use a “withTimezone”
> configuration method.
>
> 2. Data that comes in from multiple timezones. This is the trickier case;
> we want to add or subtract an offset to get the timestamp to UTC, but this
> offset could be different from record to record. We could compare the log’s
> timestamp to the system timestamp to get a guess at the log’s timezone, but
> I’m not sure how reliable and efficient this would be.
>
> Let me know what you all think about these two cases.
>
> Domenic
>
> On 5/27/16, 1:29 PM, "Kumar, Sunny" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Hi all
> >
> >Here at Capital One we want to standardize the timestamp of each
> telemetry tuple to UTC and we think this might be useful for Metron in
> general too.
> >If you think so too then we'll be happy to contribute this back to
> Metron. And again if so, I would like to have a quick sort-of architecture
> discussion for the use-case.
> >Please let me know what do you guys think?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Sunny
> >________________________________________________________
> >
> >The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from your computer.
> ________________________________________________________
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from your computer.
>
-- 

Jon

Reply via email to